Many of you probably remember me complaining about KK's sleeping issues. Well the past two days have posed a new dilemma. KK went to sleep Monday night at 10:00 p.m. She then woke up at 6:15 a.m. and had one nap from 2-4 p.m. I think I had went to sleep at 11:00 p.m. that night and KK woke me up at least once or twice during the night. So, I definately didn't get enough sleep.
Well, last night she went to bed at 9:30 p.m. Do you know what time she woke up? Can you believe she woke up at 5:30 a.m.? I totally tried to get her back to sleep but she wasn't having any of that. I think I went to bed around 10:30 and she woke me up twice last night. Yet another night of not enough sleep.
Personally, I think I like it better when she doesn't nap. Strange that a two year old only requires a total of 10 hours of sleep in a 24 hour period. If she doesn't nap she typically sleeps from 10 p.m. to 8 a.m. This gives me an opportunity to try and get in 8 hours of interrupted sleep but I find that much better than 7.
So what do you think? What would you prefer? A child that sleeps 8 hours at night and naps 2 hours during the day, or 10 hours at night and no nap? I bet you this girl will totally be a late night party girl when she is older, boy am I in for some trouble!
1 comment:
When Asha and Roshan were skipping naps and sleeping late, I liked being able to sleep in. However, they were so cranky without naps, so I decided I'd rather have them nap.
Post a Comment